Synthesis Quick Reference #
Evidence note: Any quantitative thresholds on this page are starter heuristics unless linked to the Evidence Ledger or a primary source + date. Calibrate by domain.
The Core Finding (in one sentence) #
Behavior selection determines outcomes more than execution quality.
Right behavior + mediocre execution beats wrong behavior + excellent execution.
The Behavior Fit Assessment (the three dimensions) #
Before you invest in solution design, screen candidate behaviors using the Behavior Fit Assessment.
The Behavior Fit Assessment is a practitioner decision tool for comparing candidate behaviors across Dispositional Fit, Capability Fit, and Context Fit. It is not a validated measurement instrument. Treat the minimum dimension as a bottleneck and prioritization heuristic; it is not a deterministic probability of behavior.
A score of 6 out of 10 on each Behavior Fit Assessment dimension is a starting threshold that must be calibrated by domain, population, context, stakes, and observed behavior.
Dispositional Fit #
Does this behavior match the population’s relatively enduring tendencies and preferences?
- High: The behavior draws on existing interests, values, preferences, characteristic priorities, and tolerances.
- Low: The behavior repeatedly demands tendencies or priorities that appear weak or uncommon in the target population.
“Identity Fit” is the legacy alternate name for this BFA dimension. Self-concept can be one signal in a specific case, but it does not define Dispositional Fit.
Capability Fit #
Can users actually perform this behavior in the real world?
- High: low skill requirement; first completion is easy for the median user.
- Low: requires sustained attention, special knowledge, physical ability, or complex setup.
Context Fit #
Does the environment support the behavior where it naturally occurs?
- High: the environment reliably triggers and enables repetition (tools, time, norms, infrastructure).
- Low: the environment blocks the behavior (time scarcity, stigma, interruptions, missing infrastructure).
The decision rules #
- Use a rating below the calibrated starting screen to identify a candidate bottleneck or evidence gap.
- Prioritize the behavior with the strongest minimum rating and clearest outcome path, then validate it through observation in realistic contexts.
- Execute via the DRIVE Framework, which maps directly to the Four-Fit Hierarchy.
The recurring patterns #
- Match, don’t hack. The strongest strategies formalize and enable behaviors people already do (or already try to do).
- Context > technology. Execution quality matters after fit is established.
- Defaults are configuration, not magic. Defaults work best after behavior viability exists; they don’t create viability by themselves. See Why Nudges Fail.
Quick decision heuristic #
| Signal | Green | Yellow | Red |
|---|---|---|---|
| BFA minimum rating | Stronger provisional comparison | Near the calibrated starting screen | Candidate bottleneck or evidence gap |
| Time to First Behavior (TTFB) | fast | moderate | slow |
| Early retention / repetition | strong | mixed | weak |
| Action | Prioritize for validation | Gather discriminating evidence | Diagnose or generate alternatives |
Next steps #
- Browse the Case Library to see how behavior selection predicts success and failure.
- Use the Behavior Fit Assessment Worksheet in your next Research sprint.